CO129-327 - Individuals - 1904 — Page 103

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

100

letter until the 12th September 1903.

In the meantime the Government through the Attorney General brought in and secured the passage through the Legislative Council of a new Ordinance (No.13 of 1903) amending Ordinance No.18 of 1900.

The purport and effect of this Ordinance may be gathered from a perusal of Section 2 thereof which reads as follows:-

"The Chief Justice may at any time before "a title has been granted under Section 14 of "the principal Ordinance (that is Ordinance "No.18 of 1900), upon good cause shown grant "to the Attorney General leave to appeal to the "Full Court of the Supreme Court from any decision of the Land Court heretofore made, or "hereafter to be made on any Claim in relation "to land in the New Territories (other than a "decision on a Claim for compensation under "Section 14 of the principal Ordinance) in "respect of which the Land Court shall certify "that the value of the Claim is over $5,000, or "that there are special reasons why the case

2

"to land in the New Territories (other than a "decision on a Claim for compensation under "Section 14 of the principal Ordinance) in "respect of which the Land Court shall certify "that the value of the Claim is over $5,000, or "that there are special reasons why the case -16~'


Page 101
should be brought before the Full Court.
3
The Attorney General may with such leave
appeal to the Full Court from any such deci-
sion of the Land Court and the Full Court
shall hear and determine the appeal and
may make such order as it thinks fit.
4. On any such appeal the Full Court may
if it thinks fit state a case for the opinion of
the Court of Appeal on any question of law
or other matter arising on the appeal.
5. The Court of Appeal shall hear and de-
termine any such case so stated and may
make such order as it thinks fit.
6. The decision of the Court of Appeal on
any such case shall be final and conclusive
and not subject to appeal."
Page 102
3
It will be observed that the Ordinance
provides for an appeal to the Full Court
from decisions of the Land Court in certain
circumstances and a further appeal from
the Full Court to the Court of Appeal in
certain circumstances.
The Ordinance was assented to on the
8th July 1903.
On the 10th July 1903 the Attorney General
applied to the Chief Justice for leave to
appeal to the Full Court from certain deci-
sions of the Land Court.
The applications were heard by the Chief
Justice on the 17th, 18th, 20th and 21st July
1903 when he delivered judgment on the
various applications.
Page 103
3
The Chief Justice granted leave to appeal
in some cases and refused it in others.
The Attorney General appealed in the
cases in which leave was granted and the
appeals were heard by the Full Court on
the 27th, 28th, 29th, 30th and 31st July and
1st August 1903.
The Full Court delivered judgment on the
various appeals on the 7th August 1903.
The Full Court allowed some of the ap-
peals and dismissed others.
In some of the cases allowed the Full
Court stated a case for the opinion of the
Court of Appeal.
The Court of Appeal heard the cases so
stated on the 2nd and 3rd September 1903
and delivered judgment on the 12th Sep-
tember 1903.
Page 104
3
The Court of Appeal made certain orders
on the cases stated.
The judgments of the Land Court as
varied by the Full Court and the Court of
Appeal were duly carried into effect.
It is understood that the decisions of the
Land Court (subject to the appeals as
aforesaid) the judgments of the Full Court
and the Court of Appeal have finally deter-
mined the vast majority of the Claims that
were before the Land Court.
It is also understood that a few Claims
are still pending.
It is not considered necessary to trouble
you with details of the appeals and judg-
ments above referred to.
CO 882/7/8
XCR(85)72
GR1178/1922/32(III)
The correct output in HTML is provided as follows:

Edit History

2026-06-02 08:34:25 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
100 letter until the 12th September 1903. In the meantime the Government through the Attorney General brought in and secured the passage through the Legislative Council of a new Ordinance (No.13 of 1903) amending Ordinance No.18 of 1900. The purport and effect of this Ordinance may be gathered from a perusal of Section 2 thereof which reads as follows:- "The Chief Justice may at any time before "a title has been granted under Section 14 of "the principal Ordinance (that is Ordinance "No.18 of 1900), upon good cause shown grant "to the Attorney General leave to appeal to the "Full Court of the Supreme Court from any decision of the Land Court heretofore made, or "hereafter to be made on any Claim in relation "to land in the New Territories (other than a "decision on a Claim for compensation under "Section 14 of the principal Ordinance) in "respect of which the Land Court shall certify "that the value of the Claim is over $5,000, or "that there are special reasons why the case 2 "to land in the New Territories (other than a "decision on a Claim for compensation under "Section 14 of the principal Ordinance) in "respect of which the Land Court shall certify "that the value of the Claim is over $5,000, or "that there are special reasons why the case -16~' Page 101 should be brought before the Full Court. 3 The Attorney General may with such leave appeal to the Full Court from any such deci- sion of the Land Court and the Full Court shall hear and determine the appeal and may make such order as it thinks fit. 4. On any such appeal the Full Court may if it thinks fit state a case for the opinion of the Court of Appeal on any question of law or other matter arising on the appeal. 5. The Court of Appeal shall hear and de- termine any such case so stated and may make such order as it thinks fit. 6. The decision of the Court of Appeal on any such case shall be final and conclusive and not subject to appeal." Page 102 3 It will be observed that the Ordinance provides for an appeal to the Full Court from decisions of the Land Court in certain circumstances and a further appeal from the Full Court to the Court of Appeal in certain circumstances. The Ordinance was assented to on the 8th July 1903. On the 10th July 1903 the Attorney General applied to the Chief Justice for leave to appeal to the Full Court from certain deci- sions of the Land Court. The applications were heard by the Chief Justice on the 17th, 18th, 20th and 21st July 1903 when he delivered judgment on the various applications. Page 103 3 The Chief Justice granted leave to appeal in some cases and refused it in others. The Attorney General appealed in the cases in which leave was granted and the appeals were heard by the Full Court on the 27th, 28th, 29th, 30th and 31st July and 1st August 1903. The Full Court delivered judgment on the various appeals on the 7th August 1903. The Full Court allowed some of the ap- peals and dismissed others. In some of the cases allowed the Full Court stated a case for the opinion of the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal heard the cases so stated on the 2nd and 3rd September 1903 and delivered judgment on the 12th Sep- tember 1903. Page 104 3 The Court of Appeal made certain orders on the cases stated. The judgments of the Land Court as varied by the Full Court and the Court of Appeal were duly carried into effect. It is understood that the decisions of the Land Court (subject to the appeals as aforesaid) the judgments of the Full Court and the Court of Appeal have finally deter- mined the vast majority of the Claims that were before the Land Court. It is also understood that a few Claims are still pending. It is not considered necessary to trouble you with details of the appeals and judg- ments above referred to. CO 882/7/8 XCR(85)72 GR1178/1922/32(III) The correct output in HTML is provided as follows:
Baseline (Original)
100 letter until the 12th September 1903. In the meantime the Government through the Attorney General brought in and secured the passage through the Legis- lative Council of a new Ordinance (No.13 of 1903) ane nāing Ordinance No.18 of 1900. The purport and effect of this Ordinance may be gathered from a perusal of Section 2 thereof which reads as follows:- IT The Chief Justice may at any time before "a title has been granted under Section 14 of "the principal Ordinance (that is Ordinance "No.18 of 1900), upon good cause shown grant "to the Attorney General leave to appeal to the *Full Court of the Supreme Court from any deci- "sion of the Land Court heretofore made, or "hereafter to be made on any Claim in relation 2 "to land in the New Territories (other than a "decision on a Claim for compensation under * Section 14 of the principal Ordinance) in "respect of which the Land Court shall certify "that the value of the Claim is over $5,000, or "that there are special reasons why the case -16~'
2026-06-02 08:34:25 · Baseline
View content

100

letter until the 12th September 1903.

In the meantime the Government through the Attorney

General brought in and secured the passage through the Legis-

lative Council of a new Ordinance (No.13 of 1903) ane nāing

Ordinance No.18 of 1900.

The purport and effect of this Ordinance may be

gathered from a perusal of Section 2 thereof which reads as

follows:-

IT The Chief Justice may at any time before

"a title has been granted under Section 14 of

"the principal Ordinance (that is Ordinance

"No.18 of 1900), upon good cause shown grant

"to the Attorney General leave to appeal to the

*Full Court of the Supreme Court from any deci-

"sion of the Land Court heretofore made, or

"hereafter to be made on any Claim in relation

2

"to land in the New Territories (other than a

"decision on a Claim for compensation under

* Section 14 of the principal Ordinance) in

"respect of which the Land Court shall certify

"that the value of the Claim is over $5,000, or

"that there are special reasons why the case

-16~'

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.